Tagged: ip
Showing opinions 121 to 140 of 261 Next / Previous
| [cafc] Helmsderfer v. Bobrick Washroom Equip. Inc. | June 4, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Southern District of Ohio | |
| Before: Moore, Mayer, Friedman | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Blogged:How Appealing U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decides patent dispute related to baby diaper changing stations that are able to resist vandalism when... | |
| [ca9] USA v. Cope | June 4, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Central District of California | |
| Before: Fisher, Gould, Thomas | |
| criminal, sentencing, ip, en banc | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [cafc] Mars Inc. v. Coin Acceptors Inc. | June 2, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of New Jersey | |
| Before: Prost, Clevenger, Linn | |
| ip, discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [cafc] Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Bancorp Servs. L.L.C. | June 2, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Eastern District of Missouri | |
| Before: Dyk, Moore, Mayer | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca10] Utah Lighthouse Ministry v. Discovery Computing | May 29, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Utah | |
| Before: Gorsuch, Tymkovich, Parker | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [cafc] Cat Tech. LLC. v. Tubemaster Inc. | May 28, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Southern District of Texas | |
| Before: Schall, Mayer | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca5] MS State Dem Party v. Barbour | May 28, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Northern District of Mississippi | |
| Before: Jones, Davis, Garza | |
| insurance, ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Blogged:How Appealing "Fed appeals court nixes party registration, voter ID ruling" | |
| [ca7] Mostly Memories v. For Your Ease | May 27, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Northern District of Illinois | |
| Before: Evans, Sykes, Williams | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca5] Paulsson Geophysical v. Sigmar | May 23, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Western District of Texas | |
| Before: Clement, Elrod, Garwood | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca9] Witt v. Dep't Of Air Force | May 21, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Western District of Washington | |
| Before: Gould, Canby, Graber | |
| military, ip, discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Blogged:How Appealing "Federal Court Reinstates Suit on Gays in Military"How Appealing "Air Force major wins one round against 'don't ask, don't tell'"How Appealing Three-judge Ninth Circuit panel revives constitutional challenge to military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policyCalifornia Appellate Report Witt v. Department of the Air Force (9th Cir. - May 21, 2008)Volokh Conspiracy Ninth Circuit Revives Substantive Due Process Challenge to "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Policy: Wait a Second! Ninth Circuit: "Don't Ask Don't Tell" may be unconstitutional | |
| [ca2] Topps Co. v. Cadbury Stani S.A.I.C. | May 15, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Southern District of New York | |
| Before: Pooler, Keenan, Cardamone | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Blogged:How Appealing "Chewing Gum Trademark Battle Sent Back to District Court"How Appealing "I've got good news! That gum you like is going to come back in style." | |
| [ca11] Paul Oravec v. Sunny Isles Luxury Ventures | May 14, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Southern District of Florida | |
| Before: Wilson, Tjoflat, Marcus | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Blogged:How Appealing At least no one is contending that Donald Trump's hairstyle infringes any copyrights | |
| [cafc] Mangosoft Inc. v. Oracle Corp. | May 14, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of New Hampshire | |
| Before: Michel, Prost, Linn | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [cafc] Aventis Pharma S.A. v. Amphastar Pharms. Inc. | May 14, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Central District of California | |
| Before: Moore, Prost, Rader | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [cafc] E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Macdermid Printing Solutions, L.L.C. | May 14, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of New Jersey | |
| Before: Michel, Prost, Pogue, Michel | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca9] Buono v. Kempthorne | May 14, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Central District of California | |
| Before: Mckeown, Fletcher, Whyte, Whyte | |
| ip, en banc, education, first amendment | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Blogged:How Appealing Over the dissent of five judges, the Ninth Circuit denies rehearing en banc of decision holding that Congress cannot cure a government agency's Establishment...California Appellate Report Buono v. Kempthorne (9th Cir. - May 14, 2008) | |
| [cafc] Acumed LLC. v. Stryker Corp. | May 13, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Oregon | |
| Before: Newman, Gajarsa, Linn | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca9] Jacobs v. Clark County | May 12, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Nevada | |
| Before: Hawkins, Clifton, Thomas | |
| ip, education, first amendment | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Blogged:How Appealing "Court upholds dress codes; County schools do not violate students' rights"How Appealing "In a case of first impression in this circuit, we address just such a set of challenges and largely conclude that public school mandatory dress policies... | |
| [cafc] Lucent Tech. Inc v. Gateway, Inc. | May 8, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Southern District of California | |
| Before: Prost, Lourie, Linn | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Blogged:How Appealing "Court Issues Split Decision In Lucent-Microsoft Dispute" | |
| [cafc] Decisioning.com Inc. v. Federated Dept. Stores Inc. | May 7, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of South Carolina | |
| Before: Schall, Mayer, Linn | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |