Tagged: fourth amendment
Showing opinions 261 to 280 of 409 Next / Previous
[ca10] Snider v. Lincoln County | June 5, 2008 |
Appeal from the Western District of Oklahoma | |
Before: Lucero, Porfilio, Brorby | |
fourth amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
[ca10] United States v. Pikyavit | June 4, 2008 |
Appeal from the District of Utah | |
Before: Tymkovich, Holmes, O’brien | |
criminal, fourth amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
[ca5] Amer Intl Specialty v. Res-Care Inc | June 2, 2008 |
Appeal from the Southern District of Texas | |
Before: Garza, Higginbotham, Reavley | |
insurance, fourth amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
[ca9] USA v. Giberson | May 30, 2008 |
Appeal from the District of Nevada | |
Before: Schroeder, Wallace, Benitez, Benitez | |
criminal, sentencing, fourth amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
Blogged:California Appellate Report U.S. v. Giberson (9th Cir. - May 30, 2008) | |
[ca10] United States v. Planells-Guerra | May 30, 2008 |
Appeal from the District of Utah | |
Before: Ebel, Kelly, O’brien | |
criminal, fourth amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
[ca6] USA v. Purcell | May 29, 2008 |
Appeal from the Eastern District of Kentucky | |
Before: Moore, Gilman, Sutton | |
criminal, fourth amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
Blogged:Volokh Conspiracy That Your Bag, Ma'am? | |
[ca9] Beck v. City Of Upland | May 28, 2008 |
Appeal from the Central District of California | |
Before: Ikuta, Berzon, Singleton, Singleton | |
criminal, discrimination, first amendment, fourth amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
[ca10] Barber v. Jones | May 28, 2008 |
Appeal from the Western District of Oklahoma | |
Before: Lucero, Porfilio, Brorby | |
criminal, fourth amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
[cadc] USA v. McCarson, Lewis | May 27, 2008 |
Appeal from the District of Columbia | |
Before: Brown, Kavanaugh, Ginsburg | |
criminal, fourth amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
[ca6] USA v. Martin | May 23, 2008 |
Appeal from the Eastern District of Kentucky | |
Before: Batchelder, Daughtrey, Rosen | |
criminal, sentencing, fourth amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
[ca6] USA v. Smith | May 22, 2008 |
Appeal from the Eastern District of Michigan | |
Before: Batchelder, Sutton | |
criminal, fourth amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
[ca3] Egolf v. Witmer | May 22, 2008 |
Appeal from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania | |
Before: Smith, Nygaard, Hansen | |
criminal, discrimination, first amendment, fourth amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
Blogged:How Appealing "Thong-Clad Protesters Stripped of Civil Rights Suit"How Appealing "Police cleared in arresting thong-clad protesters" | |
[ca10] Strickland v. Murphy | May 21, 2008 |
Appeal from the District of Wyoming | |
Before: Gorsuch, O’brien, Mckay | |
fourth amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
[ca10] United States v. Holguin-Chavez | May 20, 2008 |
Appeal from the District of New Mexico | |
Before: Lucero, Briscoe, Tymkovich | |
criminal, fourth amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
[ca8] United States v. Roy Hudspeth | May 19, 2008 |
Appeal from the Western District of Missouri | |
Before: Colloton, Riley, Benton | |
criminal, fourth amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
[ca7] C., Michael v. Gresbach, Dana | May 19, 2008 |
Appeal from the Eastern District of Wisconsin | |
Before: Evans, Bauer, Sykes, Auer | |
education, fourth amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
[ca10] Veasman v. Mullin | May 19, 2008 |
Appeal from the Northern District of Oklahoma | |
Before: Lucero, Tymkovich, Holmes | |
fourth amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
[ca11] Edward J. Reese v. Josh Herbert | May 16, 2008 |
Appeal from the Northern District of Georgia | |
Before: Tjoflat, Black | |
discrimination, first amendment, fourth amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
[ca8] United States v. Ruben Peralez | May 14, 2008 |
Appeal from the District of South Dakota | |
Before: Melloy, Bye, Gibson | |
fourth amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
[ca7] Purtell, Jeffrey v. Mason, Bruce | May 14, 2008 |
Appeal from the Northern District of Illinois | |
Before: Kanne, Sykes, Williams, Ykes | |
first amendment, fourth amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
Blogged:How Appealing "The plaintiffs claimed their Halloween display--wooden tombstones with epitaphs describing, in unflattering terms, the demise of their neighbors--was...Volokh Conspiracy Personally Abusive Epitaphs as Fighting Words? | |