Tagged: discrimination
Showing opinions 21 to 40 of 432 Next / Previous
| [ca10] Lowber v. City of New Cordell | October 30, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Western District of Oklahoma | |
| Before: Hartz, Gorsuch, Baldock | |
| discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca7] Airadigm Comm v. Fed'l Comm Comm | October 29, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Western District of Wisconsin | |
| Before: Flaum, Rovner, Cudahy | |
| discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca10] Harwell v. Dalton | October 29, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Colorado | |
| Before: Hartz, Gorsuch, Baldock | |
| discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca7] Sierra Club v. Franklin County Powe | October 27, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Southern District of Illinois | |
| Before: Bauer, Ripple, Williams | |
| discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca11] Melbert Ray Ford v. Hilton Hall | October 27, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Northern District of Georgia | |
| Before: Dubina, Carnes, Black | |
| criminal, sentencing, discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca9] USA v. Seljan | October 23, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Central District of California | |
| Before: Rymer, Fisher, Ikuta, Clifton, Kozinski, Mckeown, Smith, Bea, Callahan, Rawlinson, Silverman | |
| criminal, sentencing, discrimination, first amendment, fourth amendment | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Blogged:How Appealing "Court says customs agents may read letters"How Appealing En banc Ninth Circuit examines what limits the Fourth Amendment places on governmental searches of FedEx packages addressed for delivery outside of... | |
| [ca10] Ramsey v. LaBette County Med. Ctr. | October 23, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Kansas | |
| Before: Brorby, O’brien, Mcconnell | |
| discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca6] Jo Ann Allen v. Highlands Hosp. Corp. | October 21, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Eastern District of Kentucky | |
| discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca7] Sycamore Industrial v. Ericsson Inc | October 20, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Northern District of Illinois | |
| Before: Flaum, Sykes, Williams | |
| environment, discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca9] Estrada-Espinoza v. Mukasey | October 20, 2008 |
| Review of Board of Immigration Appeals decision | |
| Before: Reinhardt, Paez, Gould, Kozinski, Silverman, Pregerson, Kleinfeld, Hawkins, Clifton, Thomas, Tallman | |
| immigration, criminal, discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Blogged:How Appealing "Court gives immigrant a break in youth sex case"California Appellate Report Estrada-Espinoza v. Mukasey (9th Cir. - Oct. 20, 2008) | |
| [ca9] Estrada-Espinoza v. Mukasey | October 20, 2008 |
| Review of Board of Immigration Appeals decision | |
| Before: Paez, Hawkins, Gould, Clifton, Thomas, Kozinski, Kleinfeld, Tallman, Reinhardt, Pregerson, Silverman | |
| immigration, criminal, discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca6] Daugherty v. Sajar Plastics, Inc. | October 16, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Northern District of Ohio | |
| Before: Moore, Griffin, Graham | |
| discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca10] Cooper v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | October 16, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of New Mexico | |
| Before: Gorsuch, Anderson, Baldock | |
| discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca6] USA v. Jordan | October 15, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Middle District of Tennessee | |
| Before: Moore, Cole, Graham | |
| criminal, sentencing, discrimination, fourth amendment | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca10] Gruppo v. Fed Ex Freight Sys. Inc | October 15, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Colorado | |
| Before: Tacha, Tymkovich, Porfilio | |
| discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca10] Sanders v. Sw. Bell | October 15, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Northern District of Oklahoma | |
| Before: Tacha, Tymkovich, Mckay | |
| discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca7] IN RE: Arreola, Gilbert R. | October 14, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Northern District of Illinois | |
| Before: Wood, Evans, Bauer | |
| discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca8] M.Y., etc. v. Special Sch. Dist. | October 14, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Minnesota | |
| Before: Loken, Colloton | |
| discrimination, education | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca6] Ohio Republican Party v. Jennifer Brunner | October 14, 2008 |
| Before: Batchelder, Moore, Gilman, Cook, Martin, Gibbons, Griffin, Sutton, Rogers, Cole, Mckeague, Clay, Boggs, Daughtrey, Kethledge, White | |
| en banc, discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Blogged:How Appealing "Ruling May Impede Thousands of Ohio Voters"Volokh Conspiracy Recusal Row in Ohio Republican Party v. Brunner:Volokh Conspiracy Thoughts on Brunner v. Ohio Republican Party:Volokh Conspiracy En Banc Sixth Circuit Reinstates TRO in Ohio Election Case: | |
| [ca5] Wagner v. USA | October 10, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Northern District of Texas | |
| Before: Davis, Clement, Elrod | |
| taxation, discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |