SCHALL: Circuit Judge, Federal Circuit
Showing opinions 1 to 20 of 61 Next
U.S. v. Nat'l Semiconductor Corp. | November 13, 2008 |
Before: Schall, Prost, Rader | |
Full text: PDF | |
In Re Bilski | October 30, 2008 |
Before: Newman, Dyk, Schall, Bryson, Moore, Michel, Mayer, Gajarsa, Prost, Lourie, Rader, Linn | |
finance, sentencing, ip, first amendment | |
Full text: PDF | |
Blogged:How Appealing "Court limits 'business method' patents"How Appealing En banc U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decides what constitutes a "new and useful process" for purposes of patent eligibilityVolokh Conspiracy Federal Circuit Rethinks Scope of Patentability: | |
In Re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitruest Litig. | October 15, 2008 |
Appeal from the Eastern District of New York | |
Before: Schall, Prost, Ward | |
ip | |
Full text: PDF | |
Tech. Licensing Corp. v. Videotek Inc. | October 10, 2008 |
Appeal from the Northern District of California | |
Before: Newman, Schall, Plager | |
ip | |
Full text: PDF | |
Impax Labs. Inc. v. Aventis Pharms. Inc. | October 3, 2008 |
Appeal from the District of Delaware | |
Before: Schall, Rader, Zobel | |
ip | |
Full text: PDF | |
The John Hopkins Univ. v. Datascope Corp. | October 2, 2008 |
Appeal from the District of Maryland | |
Before: Newman, Schall, Zobel | |
ip | |
Full text: PDF | |
Casitas Mun. Water Dist. v. U.S. | September 25, 2008 |
Before: Schall, Moore, Mayer | |
environment | |
Full text: PDF | |
Excelstor Tech. Inc. v. PAPST Licensing GMBH & Co. KG | September 16, 2008 |
Appeal from the Northern District of Illinois | |
Before: Schall, Mayer, Lourie | |
ip | |
Full text: PDF | |
Ellington v. Peake | September 16, 2008 |
Before: Newman, Schall, Moore | |
Full text: PDF | |
Drygel, Inc. v. U.S. | September 9, 2008 |
Appeal from the Northern District of California | |
Before: Schall, Rader, Illston | |
Full text: PDF | |
Capellan v. Peake | September 2, 2008 |
Before: Newman, Schall, Mayer | |
military | |
Full text: PDF | |
Star Scientific Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. | August 25, 2008 |
Appeal from the District of Maryland | |
Before: Dyk, Schall, Michel | |
ip | |
Full text: PDF | |
SKF USA, Inc v. U.S. | August 25, 2008 |
Before: Schall, Mayer, Linn | |
Full text: PDF | |
DSW Inc. v. Shoe Pavilion Inc. | August 19, 2008 |
Appeal from the Central District of California | |
Before: Schall, Mayer, Linn | |
ip | |
Full text: PDF | |
Suess v. U.S. | August 7, 2008 |
Before: Schall, Moore, Mayer | |
finance | |
Full text: PDF | |
Proveris Scientific Corp. v. Innovasystems Inc. | August 5, 2008 |
Appeal from the District of Massachusetts | |
Before: Schall, Bryson, Gajarsa | |
ip, discrimination | |
Full text: PDF | |
Yingbin Nature Wood Ind. Co. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n | July 31, 2008 |
Before: Dyk, Schall, Michel | |
ip | |
Full text: PDF | |
Klamath Irrigation Dist. v. U.S. | July 16, 2008 |
Before: Schall, Bryson, Gajarsa | |
Full text: PDF | |
Lizzio v. Dept. of the Army | July 16, 2008 |
Before: Newman, Schall, Linn | |
criminal, military | |
Full text: PDF | |
Deckers Corp. v. U.S. | July 2, 2008 |
Before: Schall, Gajarsa, Clevenger | |
Full text: PDF | |
Blogged:How Appealing Exactly what sort of footwear are Teva Sports Sandals? | |
Showing opinions 1 to 20 of 61 Next