United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Showing opinions 21 to 40 of 346 Next / Previous
| Impax Labs. Inc. v. Aventis Pharms. Inc. | October 3, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Delaware | |
| Before: Schall, Rader, Zobel | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| The John Hopkins Univ. v. Datascope Corp. | October 2, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Maryland | |
| Before: Newman, Schall, Zobel | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| White v. U.S. | October 1, 2008 |
| Before: Newman, Moore, Prost | |
| insurance | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Praxair v. ATMI | September 29, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Delaware | |
| Before: Dyk, Bryson, Lourie | |
| ip, discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Conley v. Peake | September 29, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Eastern District of Virginia | |
| Before: Moore, Michel, O'grady | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Casitas Mun. Water Dist. v. U.S. | September 25, 2008 |
| Before: Schall, Moore, Mayer | |
| environment | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Lucent Tech. Inc. v. Gateway Inc. | September 25, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Southern District of California | |
| Before: Bryson, Prost, Lourie | |
| ip, discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Blogged:How Appealing Federal Circuit affirms decision granting judgment as a matter of law in favor of Microsoft after jury awarded $1.5 billion to Lucent Technologies... | |
| Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcom Inc. | September 24, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Central District of California | |
| Before: Prost, Linn, Friedman | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Blogged:How Appealing "Ruling in Qualcomm-Broadcom Fight Brings Back Opinion Letters for Patent Cases"How Appealing "Broadcom wins upheld injunction against Qualcomm" | |
| Greenstreet v. Soc. Sec. Admin. | September 24, 2008 |
| Before: Newman, Lourie, Linn | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Aritocrat Technologies Australia PTY Lmtd. v. Int'l Game Tech. | September 22, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Northern District of California | |
| Before: Newman, Bryson, Linn | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Org. v. Buffalo Tech. Inc. | September 19, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Eastern District of Texas | |
| Before: Bryson, Lourie, Rader | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Broadcom Corp. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n | September 19, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Southern District of California | |
| Before: Bryson, Rader, Linn | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| The Campbell Pet Co. v. Miale | September 18, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Western District of Washington | |
| Before: Bryson, Prost, Archer | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Delmarva Power & Light Co. v. U.S. | September 18, 2008 |
| Before: Prost, Linn, Friedman | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Mittal Steel Point Lisas Lmtd. v. U.S. | September 18, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Northern District of Illinois | |
| Before: Bryson, Prost, Zagel | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Duncan v. Office of Compliance | September 16, 2008 |
| Before: Newman, Michel, Prost | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Excelstor Tech. Inc. v. PAPST Licensing GMBH & Co. KG | September 16, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Northern District of Illinois | |
| Before: Schall, Mayer, Lourie | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Ellington v. Peake | September 16, 2008 |
| Before: Newman, Schall, Moore | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Med. Solutions Inc. v. C. Change Surgical | September 9, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Columbia | |
| Before: Bryson, Prost, Zagel | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Drygel, Inc. v. U.S. | September 9, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Northern District of California | |
| Before: Schall, Rader, Illston | |
| Full text: PDF | |