United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Showing opinions 101 to 120 of 346 Next / Previous
| Helmsderfer v. Bobrick Washroom Equip. Inc. | June 4, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Southern District of Ohio | |
| Before: Moore, Mayer, Friedman | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Blogged:How Appealing U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decides patent dispute related to baby diaper changing stations that are able to resist vandalism when... | |
| Gen. Injectables & Vaccines, Inc. v. Sec. of Def. | June 3, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Northern District of California | |
| Before: Bryson, Mayer, Fogel | |
| en banc | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Bancorp Servs. L.L.C. | June 2, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Eastern District of Missouri | |
| Before: Dyk, Moore, Mayer | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Romero v. Dept. of Def. | June 2, 2008 |
| Before: Dyk, Bryson, Lourie | |
| military | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Mars Inc. v. Coin Acceptors Inc. | June 2, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of New Jersey | |
| Before: Prost, Clevenger, Linn | |
| ip, discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Cat Tech. LLC. v. Tubemaster Inc. | May 28, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Southern District of Texas | |
| Before: Schall, Mayer | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| W. Shoshone Nat'l Council v. U.S. | May 22, 2008 |
| Before: Schall, Prost, Rader | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| 1-10 Ind. Assoc. LLC v. U.S. | May 21, 2008 |
| Before: Dyk, Bryson, Clevenger | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Golden Bridge Tech. Inc. v. Nokia Inc. | May 21, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Eastern District of Texas | |
| Before: Newman, Moore, Michel | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Huntleigh USA Corp. v. U.S. | May 15, 2008 |
| Before: Newman, Schall, Mayer | |
| fifth amendment | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Blogged:How Appealing Federal Circuit rejects claim for damages against federal government asserted by private company that, before the September 11th terrorist attacks,... | |
| E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Macdermid Printing Solutions, L.L.C. | May 14, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of New Jersey | |
| Before: Michel, Prost, Pogue, Michel | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Aventis Pharma S.A. v. Amphastar Pharms. Inc. | May 14, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Central District of California | |
| Before: Moore, Prost, Rader | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Mangosoft Inc. v. Oracle Corp. | May 14, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of New Hampshire | |
| Before: Michel, Prost, Linn | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Springer v. Adkins | May 14, 2008 |
| Before: Newman, Mayer, Lourie | |
| discrimination | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Acumed LLC. v. Stryker Corp. | May 13, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Oregon | |
| Before: Newman, Gajarsa, Linn | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Mansfield v. Peake | May 12, 2008 |
| Before: Newman, Schall, Friedman | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Haas v. Peake | May 8, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Northern District of California | |
| Before: Bryson, Michel, Fogel | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Blogged:How Appealing Federal Circuit decides Agent Orange-related case involving veterans' benefits | |
| Lucent Tech. Inc v. Gateway, Inc. | May 8, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Southern District of California | |
| Before: Prost, Lourie, Linn | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Blogged:How Appealing "Court Issues Split Decision In Lucent-Microsoft Dispute" | |
| Atamirzayeva v. U.S. | May 7, 2008 |
| Before: Bryson, Mayer, Gajarsa | |
| fifth amendment, fourth amendment | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| Blogged:How Appealing "The sole question presented on appeal is whether a foreign citizen with no connection to the United States has a right to just compensation under...Volokh Conspiracy The Bill of Rights Abroad: | |
| Solomon Tech. Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n | May 7, 2008 |
| Before: Bryson, Lourie, Rader | |
| ip | |
| Full text: PDF | |