Mathirampuzha v. Potter
Second Circuit: November 3, 2008
Appeal from the District of Connecticut
Full Text: PDF
Tagged: insurance, discrimination
Authorities Cited: 5 U.S.C. § 8101 5 U.S.C. § 8116(c) 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b) 5 U.S.C. § 8145 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b) 28 U.S.C. § 2671 28 U.S.C. § 2674 28 U.S.C. § 2680 39 U.S.C. § 409(c) 39 U.S.C. § 1005(c) 29 C.F.R. § 4 29 C.F.R. § 24 29 C.F.R. § 27 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105 29 C.F.R. § 1614.408 10 U.S. 213, 223 16 U.S. 81, 90 352 U.S. 59, 63-64 355 U.S. 874 385 U.S. 1012 411 U.S. 5 450 U.S. 248, 252-253 458 U.S. 50, 67-70 460 U.S. 190, 193-194 467 U.S. 837, 844 473 U.S. 568, 583 486 U.S. 549, 558-559 498 U.S. 3 507 U.S. 258, 268 509 U.S. 502, 506-507 511 U.S. 1030 513 U.S. 1082 524 U.S. 742 531 U.S. 875 536 U.S. 101, 115 536 U.S. 922 537 U.S. 824 540 U.S. 877 546 U.S. 481, 484-485 914 F. 7 8 F.2d 1168, 1173-1174 244 F.2d 708, 710 267 F.2d 135, 137-138 306 F.2d 769, 771 356 F.2d 837, 840 669 F.2d 947, 951 687 F.2d 14, 16 687 F.2d 15 717 F.2d 254, 257 841 F.2d 278, 281 846 F.2d 12 904 F.2d 128, 130 917 F.2d 424 954 F.2d 634, 639 970 F.2d 194, 197-198 998 F.2d 837, 838 7 F.3d 195, 200-201 7 F.3d 1405, 1407-1408 19 F.3d 384, 386 28 F.3d 746, 747 66 F.3d 1295, 1305 82 F.3d 1304, 1307 143 F.3d 232, 214-239 202 F.3d 560, 569-570 210 F.3d 272, 277 216 F.3d 1229, 1223-1235 217 F.3d 25 232 F.3d 2 235 F.3d 129, 131-132 235 F.3d 763, 766 251 F.3d 345, 358-360 277 F.3d 19 277 F.3d 128, 136 308 F.3d 1091, 1092 326 F.3d 5 326 F.3d 1068 336 F.3d 128, 138-151 361 F.3d 749, 755 364 F.3d 54, 59 368 F.3d 123, 128 377 F.3d 133, 139 416 F.3d 109 420 F.3d 166, 178 438 F.3d 214, 217 446 F.3d 159, 161 458 F.3d 67, 70-71 471 F.3d 204, 206-208 483 F.3d 135, 137 524 F.3d 160, 164 Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c) 25 F. Supp. 2d 455, 458 371 F. Supp. 2d 159, 161-163
Blogged: Wait a Second! Being smacked around by a supervisor is not an "adverse employment action" Wait a Second! Administrative exhaustion requirements strictly enforced in Title VII claim