Diaz v. Paterson; Diamond v. Paterson
Second Circuit: October 17, 2008
Appeal from the Southern District of New York
Before: Pooler, Jacobs, Kearse
Full Text: PDF
Authorities Cited: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 263 U.S. 413 407 U.S. 67, 80-86 416 U.S. 16 417 U.S. 901 423 U.S. 147, 149 424 U.S. 319, 334 448 U.S. 297, 323 460 U.S. 462 464 U.S. 801 467 U.S. 1, 15 481 U.S. 739, 745 501 U.S. 1 510 U.S. 43, 62 544 U.S. 280 670 F.2d 2 889 F.2d 1258, 1265 987 F.2d 18 21 F.3d 105, 110 56 F.3d 394, 402 71 F.3d 88, 92-93 116 F.3d 804, 811 182 F.3d 820, 8374 212 F.3d 138, 144 221 F.3d 329, 337 306 F.3d 40, 51 321 F.3d 292, 300 445 F.3d 136, 150-151 470 F.3d 498, 504 499 F.3d 1196, 1203 503 F.3d 186, 190 511 F.3d 126, 128 Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 368 F. Supp. 2d 265 379 F. Supp. 9 661 F. Supp. 281, 297
Blogged: Wait a Second! The New York lis pendens law is constitutional