MLB Properties v. Salvino
Second Circuit: September 12, 2008
Appeal from the Southern District of New York
Before: Sotomayor, Kearse, Cedarbaum
Full Text: PDF
Tagged: ip
Authorities Cited: 15 U.S.C. § 1 15 U.S.C. § 2 15 U.S.C. § 18 8 U.S. 377, 394 9 U.S. 328, 338 10 U.S. 294, 320 172 U.S. 211 220 U.S. 373 246 U.S. 231 310 U.S. 37 310 U.S. 150, 222-224 328 U.S. 781, 809-810 341 U.S. 593, 598 356 U.S. 1, 5 372 U.S. 36 384 U.S. 127, 142-143 393 U.S. 333, 334-338 405 U.S. 596 429 U.S. 477, 488 433 U.S. 10 433 U.S. 36, 49 435 U.S. 679, 691-693 441 U.S. 1 446 U.S. 643, 647-650 457 U.S. 332 467 U.S. 752, 768 468 U.S. 9 468 U.S. 85 469 U.S. 752 472 U.S. 284, 295-298 474 U.S. 829 476 U.S. 21 476 U.S. 447, 458-459 477 U.S. 242 498 U.S. 46 509 U.S. 579, 592 522 U.S. 3, 10 526 U.S. 7 526 U.S. 137, 141 526 U.S. 756, 752-770 530 U.S. 21 546 U.S. 815 547 U.S. 1, 5-7 85 F. 271, 280-283 648 F.2d 97, 105 759 F.2d 989, 998 776 F.2d 185, 188-189 789 F.2d 986, 989 792 F.2d 210, 224-228 909 F.2d 75, 76 10 F.3d 105, 114-129 12 F.3d 135, 151 18 F.3d 18, 22 21 F.3d 512, 517 34 F.3d 1091, 1102 36 F.3d 958, 970 53 F.3d 825, 828-829 61 F.3d 123, 127 88 F.3d 63, 71 125 F.3d 55, 66 142 F.3d 90, 95 152 F.3d 48, 52 183 F.3d 155, 160 196 F.3d 435, 452 201 F.3d 4 322 F.3d 1133, 1151 357 F.3d 205, 225 375 F.3d 23 386 F.3d 485, 506-507 397 F.3d 11 427 F.3d 1008, 1012 457 F.3d 211, 215 Fed. R. App. P. 13 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e) 420 F. Supp. 2d 7 420 F. Supp. 2d 23 420 F. Supp. 2d 212 Fed. R. Evid. 702 Fed. R. Evid. 801(c) Fed. R. Evid. 803(6)
Blogged: How Appealing Second Circuit rejects antitrust challenge against the exclusive licensing agent for Major League Baseball clubs' intellectual property