Authorities Cited: United States Code 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) 17 U.S.C. § 1 17 U.S.C. § 24 17 U.S.C. § 101 17 U.S.C. § 102(b) 17 U.S.C. § 106(1) 17 U.S.C. § 106(2) 17 U.S.C. § 107 17 U.S.C. § 502(a) 17 U.S.C. § 504(a) 17 U.S.C. § 504(c)(1) 17 U.S.C. § 507(b) Supreme Court 470 U.S. 226, 261 471 U.S. 539, 550-565 495 U.S. 207, 230-236 499 U.S. 340, 348-361 510 U.S. 569, 577-593 544 U.S. 197, 217-221 547 U.S. 388, 392 Circuit Courts 234 F. 105, 108 81 F.2d 49, 56 279 F.2d 100, 105 281 F.2d 543 446 F.2d 338, 339 616 F.2d 1315, 1325 626 F.2d 1171, 1176 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 684 F.2d 821, 829 736 F.2d 1352, 1357 744 F.2d 1490, 1496-149637 811 F.2d 90, 92-99 847 F.2d 255, 267 856 F.2d 1341 873 F.2d 576, 584 942 F.2d 1032, 1038 960 F.2d 1020, 1040 970 F.2d 1043, 1049 970 F.2d 1067, 1079 999 F.2d 1436, 1440 20 F.3d 454, 459-463 43 F.3d 609, 613 60 F.3d 913, 931 72 F.3d 921, 928 79 F.3d 1532, 1541-1542 87 F.3d 457, 462 89 F.3d 1548, 1554-1560 103 F.3d 257, 259 115 F.3d 1509 120 F.3d 1199, 1207 125 F.3d 580, 581-582 126 F.3d 70, 75-81 138 F.3d 453, 456 145 F.3d 481, 485 150 F.3d 132, 142-145 155 F.3d 140, 144 182 F.3d 1291, 1293 193 F.3d 1241, 1247-1262 212 F.3d 1210, 1214 243 F.3d 789, 798-800 245 F.3d 1289, 1291 263 F.3d 942, 959 263 F.3d 1234, 1243 268 F.3d 1257, 1266-1275 275 F.3d 726 283 F.3d 877, 882 287 F.3d 936, 951 287 F.3d 1325, 1330-1334 290 F.3d 548, 565 292 F.3d 512, 517-522 298 F.3d 1228, 1232 320 F.3d 1235, 1249 328 F.3d 848, 858 331 F.3d 988, 993 344 F.3d 1288, 1290 354 F.3d 112, 117 371 F.3d 883, 889 419 F.3d 1201, 1203 467 F.3d 244, 252 474 F.3d 227, 234 489 F.3d 1129 492 F.3d 532, 543 496 F.3d 1282, 1284 508 F.3d 641, 646 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f) Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) 11 F. Supp. 2d 329, 334-335 117 F. Supp. 2d 301, 306 177 F. Supp. 303, 307 178 F. Supp. 2d 758, 764 479 F. Supp. 351, 357 491 F. Supp. 2d 177, 189 503 F. Supp. 1137, 1144 598 F. Supp. 36, 37

Blogged: How Appealing "The question whether the equitable doctrine of laches may bar a claim for copyright infringement that was filed within the statute of limitations has generated a circuit split and is a question of first impression in this circuit."