Opinions from all courts
Showing opinions 121 to 140 of 9312 Next / Previous
| [ca7] Choose Life IL v. White, Jesse | November 10, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Northern District of Illinois | |
| Before: Evans, Sykes, Manion | |
| insurance, first amendment | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca9] Flores-Torres v. Mukasey | November 10, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Northern District of California | |
| Before: Nelson, Reinhardt, Schroeder | |
| immigration | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca1] v. | November 10, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Puerto Rico | |
| Before: Lynch, Selya, Howard | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: laches and holocaust painting caseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: data-mined prescription information not protected speech Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Medicare fight over research ends in heroic victory for governmentAppellate Law & Practice CA1: moody teens, ERISA, and shortening the limitations period Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Girl interrupted was “molested” not “exploited”Appellate Law & Practice CA1: vindicative license revocation okay due to preclusion Appellate Law & Practice CA1: declaratory judgments not that preclusiveAppellate Law & Practice CA1: The District Court acted just too jerky in dismissing the complaintAppellate Law & Practice CA1: crack retroactivity doesn’t go below mandatory minimums Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Land Rover dealer not that oppressed Appellate Law & Practice CA1: developer plaintiff moves forward with “class of one” environmental caseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: a Checkbook is not a payment under ERISA | |
| [ca1] Andrew Robinson v. Hartford Fire | November 10, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Massachusetts | |
| Before: Selya, Howard, Baldock | |
| insurance | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: declaratory judgments not that preclusive | |
| [ca1] US v. Boyd | November 10, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Massachusetts | |
| Before: Howard, Lipez, Boudin | |
| fourth amendment | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| [ca1] Giragosian v. Ryan | November 10, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Massachusetts | |
| Before: Torruella, Lipez, Baldock | |
| environment, fourth amendment | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: vindicative license revocation okay due to preclusion | |
| [ca9] Richter v. Hickman | November 10, 2008 |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca11] USA v. Antwan Lamount Steed | November 10, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Northern District of Alabama | |
| Before: Carnes, Wilson, Fay | |
| criminal, sentencing, fourth amendment | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca7] Atkins, William O. v. City Chicago | November 10, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Northern District of Illinois | |
| Before: Posner, Flaum, Evans | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca7] Muhammad, Dennis v. Oliver, Christi | November 10, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Northern District of Illinois | |
| Before: Posner, Rovner, Cudahy | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca7] Bus. Sys. v. Int'l Bus. | November 10, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Northern District of Illinois | |
| Before: Wood, Manion, Tinder | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca6] Herbert Derickson v. United States Dep't of Agriculture | November 10, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Eastern District of Kentucky | |
| Before: Moore, Cook, Hood | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca2] U.S.A. v. Lopez | November 10, 2008 |
| Appeal from the Southern District of New York | |
| Before: Cabranes, Leval, Kearse | |
| criminal, fourth amendment | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca10] Aquila v. C. W. Mining Co. | November 7, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Utah | |
| Before: Gorsuch, Ebel, Mcconnell | |
| finance | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca10] Wei v. Mukasey | November 7, 2008 |
| Review of Board of Immigration Appeals decision | |
| Before: Hartz, Brorby, Murphy | |
| immigration | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca1] v. | November 7, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Massachusetts | |
| Before: Lynch, Selya, Lipez | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: laches and holocaust painting caseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: data-mined prescription information not protected speech Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Medicare fight over research ends in heroic victory for governmentAppellate Law & Practice CA1: moody teens, ERISA, and shortening the limitations period Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Girl interrupted was “molested” not “exploited”Appellate Law & Practice CA1: vindicative license revocation okay due to preclusion Appellate Law & Practice CA1: declaratory judgments not that preclusiveAppellate Law & Practice CA1: The District Court acted just too jerky in dismissing the complaintAppellate Law & Practice CA1: crack retroactivity doesn’t go below mandatory minimums Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Land Rover dealer not that oppressed Appellate Law & Practice CA1: developer plaintiff moves forward with “class of one” environmental caseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: a Checkbook is not a payment under ERISAAppellate Law & Practice CA1: the limits of Scott v. HarrisAppellate Law & Practice CA1: cops can take your drivers’ license without seizing youAppellate Law & Practice CA1: First speaks on material misrepresentation Appellate Law & Practice CA1: forfeiture remand in light of Santos and excessive fines clauseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: Fifteen year mandatory minimum for guy in wheelchair trying to produce child pr0n okay | |
| [ca1] v. | November 7, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Maine | |
| Before: Lynch, Howard, Torruella | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: laches and holocaust painting caseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: data-mined prescription information not protected speech Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Medicare fight over research ends in heroic victory for governmentAppellate Law & Practice CA1: moody teens, ERISA, and shortening the limitations period Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Girl interrupted was “molested” not “exploited”Appellate Law & Practice CA1: vindicative license revocation okay due to preclusion Appellate Law & Practice CA1: declaratory judgments not that preclusiveAppellate Law & Practice CA1: The District Court acted just too jerky in dismissing the complaintAppellate Law & Practice CA1: crack retroactivity doesn’t go below mandatory minimums Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Land Rover dealer not that oppressed Appellate Law & Practice CA1: developer plaintiff moves forward with “class of one” environmental caseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: a Checkbook is not a payment under ERISAAppellate Law & Practice CA1: the limits of Scott v. HarrisAppellate Law & Practice CA1: cops can take your drivers’ license without seizing youAppellate Law & Practice CA1: First speaks on material misrepresentation Appellate Law & Practice CA1: forfeiture remand in light of Santos and excessive fines clauseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: Fifteen year mandatory minimum for guy in wheelchair trying to produce child pr0n okay | |
| [ca9] S. Union Co. v. Irvin | November 7, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Arizona | |
| Before: Reinhardt, Noonan, Fernandez | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca9] Martinez v. Mukasey | November 7, 2008 |
| Before: Pregerson, Noonan, Trott | |
| Full text: PDF | |
| [ca9] USA v. Miller | November 7, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Idaho | |
| Before: Canby, Pregerson, Noonan | |
| criminal, sentencing | |
| Full text: PDF | |